I think it is quite ludicrous that there has been so much on-going debate on "Global Warming." What really gets my dander up is this notion that "scientific concensus" equals proof that such a thing actually exists.
In an article I found on Financial Times (via a link from Slashdot), Czech Republic President Vaclav Klaus openly declares his frustration with a scientific community whose primary purpose is no longer to seek truth, but is to enact global social change through not hard data, but "scientific concensus" based on woefully inadequate sources. I urge you to read his piece, as I am afraid I'll do it no justice. Suffice it to say, that I whole-heartedly agree with it, and hope someone gets the cohones to take the scientific community to task and ask for truly hard evidence, rather than near-religious faith in quite sketchy speculation based on data which they have twisted and bent to fit their own socio-political agenda; state what their political affiliation is and demand that we know what might be their motivation for such religious fervor about something that has no substantial proof.
Link: Financial Times Article by Vaclav Klaus
I know that your Dad would be saying Amen and Amen to your post. I agree whole heartedly with you on the sceintific consensus phooey stuff, however, I am not so sure that there isnt some type of global warming going on. Brought on by man,,, I doubt it!!! But, I do believe it is part of the "birth pangs" that is talked about in Revelations in the end times. If God is choosing man to bring about the end time prophecy fullfillment,,, well then there isnt anything any mortal man can do to stop it. We must just praise God that we belong to Him and that he has promised to never leave us or forsake us.
ReplyDeleteMom